The right tool depends on the noise and on where the file can go. Audacity gives you an editor and a measured way to reduce steady noise. Adobe Podcast puts speech cleanup behind a browser upload. Neither workflow is the same as processing a local folder in one pass.
A steady fan is Audacity’s case
Audacity’s Noise Reduction manual asks for a section that contains only the noise. You capture that profile, select the audio, and apply the effect. Its noise-only preview lets you hear what will be removed before committing.
That makes sense for hum, hiss or a fan that stays similar through the recording. Audacity says the effect does not remove one-off sounds such as a door slam. Pushing reduction too far can damage the voice, so listen to the result.
Adobe Podcast is a browser speech pass
Adobe Podcast Enhance Speech reduces background noise and echo in spoken recordings. It needs an upload, but no captured noise profile. Adobe also provides recording and transcript editing in the browser.
The free plan enhances audio one file at a time, with a 30-minute file limit and a one-hour daily limit. Bulk uploads and strength controls sit in its paid plan. That makes the free route simple for a short interview, less suited to a folder of long episodes.
Where Gleam Audio fits
Gleam Audio cleans speech on your computer with a model trained on speech. There’s no noise-only section to find and no upload. It runs over a whole session of files at once, with a Strength slider when you want to keep more of the room. Enhance, Cut, Split and Convert are built in, but it isn’t a multitrack editor. See its 1.0 release notes.
For one steady-noise recording that needs detailed edits, Audacity is the better pick. For a short voice file when an upload is fine, Adobe Podcast has the shorter path. When several speech files need the same cleanup and must stay local, use Gleam Audio.
See the wider voice noise removal list for tools that handle different parts of this work.